4.7 Article

Effects of Al on microstructure and tensile properties of C-bearing high Mn TWIP steel

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 60, 期 4, 页码 1680-1688

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.004

关键词

Twinning; Stacking-fault energy; Strain-hardening rate; Dynamic strain aging; Strain-rate sensitivity

资金

  1. Fundamental R&D Program for Core Technology of Materials
  2. Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea
  3. POSCO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of Al on microstructure, stacking fault energy, tensile properties and fractured surface in Fe-18Mn-0.6C-(0-2)Al twinning-induced plasticity (TWIP) steels were systemically investigated. The Al addition suppressed the cementite precipitation during cooling after hot-rolling. The stacking-fault energy was linearly raised with a constant slope of 7.8 mJ m(-2) per 1 wt.% Al. The Al addition increased the yield stress, reduction in area, uniform (e(u)), and post-uniform (e(pu)) elongations, while it decreased the amount and rate of strain hardening and dynamic strain aging (DSA). In particular, although the e(pu) of the TWIP steel without Al was almost zero, it was improved up to similar to 7% by addition of 2 wt.% Al, which was comparable with those of dual phase and TRIP steels with a similar tensile strength of 780 MPa. In order to elucidate the reasons for the poor e(pu) in C-bearing TWIP steel and for the prolonged e(pu) by Al addition, the apparent absolute strain-rate sensitivity m = d sigma/d In (epsilon) over dot of two TWIP steels with different Al concentrations of 0 and 2 wt.% was investigated at room temperature. Both TWIP steels had negative strain-rate sensitivity at a large strain (epsilon = 0.4) of just before necking. However, the Al addition increased the strain-rate sensitivity, resulting in improved e(pu) because of reduced DSA by decreases in both activity and diffusivity of C in austenite. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据