4.7 Article

Dendrite fragmentation and columnar-to-equiaxed transition during directional solidification at lower growth speed under a strong magnetic field

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 60, 期 8, 页码 3321-3332

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.019

关键词

Columnar-to-equiaxed transition (CET); Thermoelectric magnetic force; Strong magnetic field

资金

  1. Bl-inter [09_473220]
  2. National natural Science Foundation of China [51171106, 2011CB610404]
  3. Shanghai Phosphor Science Foundation of China [10QA1402500]
  4. Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of strong magnetic fields on the columnar-to-equiaxed transition (CET) have been investigated experimentally. Six alloys have been directionally solidified at low growth speeds (1-10 mu m s(-1)) under magnetic fields up to 10 T. Experimental results show that the application of a strong magnetic field causes a dendrite fragmentation and then the CET. The thermoelectric magnetic force acting on cells/dendrites and equiaxed grains in the mushy zone has been studied numerically. Numerical results reveal that the value of the thermoelectric magnetic force increases as the magnetic field intensity and the temperature gradient increase. A torque is created on cells/dendrites and equiaxed grains. This torque breaks cells/dendrites and drives the rotation of equiaxed grains. The rotation of equiaxed grains in the mushy zone will further destroy cells/dendrites. Thus, with the increase of the magnetic field intensity and the temperature gradient, the volume fraction of equiaxed grains in front of columnar dendrites increases. When the magnetic field intensity and the temperature gradient reach a critical value, the growth of columnar dendrites is blocked and the CET then occurs. The present work may initiate a new method of inducing the CET via an applied strong magnetic field during directional solidification. (C) 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据