4.7 Article

Effects of tensile test parameters on the mechanical properties of a bimodal Al-Mg alloy

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 60, 期 16, 页码 5838-5849

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.024

关键词

Bimodal grain size; Aluminum; Plastic deformation; Tensile testing

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1053434]
  2. University of Alabama
  3. Office of Naval Research [N00014-12-1-0237]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1053434] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The properties of aluminum alloy (AA) 5083 are shown to be significantly improved by grain size reduction through cryomilling and the incorporation of unmilled Al particles into the material, creating a bimodal grain size distribution consisting of coarse grains in a nanocrystalline matrix. To provide insight into the mechanical behavior and ultimately facilitate engineering applications, the present study reports on the effects of coarse grain ratio, anisotropy, strain rate and specimen size on the elastic-plastic behavior of bimodal AA 5083 evaluated in uniaxial tension tests using a full-factorial experiment design. To determine the governing failure mechanisms under different testing conditions, the specimens' failure surfaces were analyzed using optical and electron microscopy. The results of the tests were found to conform to Joshi's plasticity model. Significant anisotropy effects were observed, in a drastic reduction in strength and ductility, when tension was applied perpendicular (transverse) to the direction of extrusion. These specimens also exhibited a smooth, flat fracture surface morphology with a significantly different surface texture than specimens tested in the axial direction. It was found that decreasing specimen thickness and strain rate served to increase both the strength and ductility of the material. The failure surface morphology was found to differ between specimens of different thicknesses. (C) 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据