4.7 Article

Enrichment of Gd and Al atoms in the quadruple close packed planes and their in-plane long-range ordering in the long period stacking-ordered phase in the Mg-Al-Gd system

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 59, 期 19, 页码 7287-7299

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.08.011

关键词

Magnesium alloys; Scanning/transmission electron microscopy; Crystal structure; Order-disorder structure

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [22656156, 23360306]
  2. International Center for Integrated Research and Advanced Education in Materials Science, Japan
  3. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23656429, 23246122, 22656156, 23360306] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The crystal structure of a long period stacking-ordered (LPSO) phase newly found in the Mg-Al-Gd ternary system has been investigated by scanning transmission and transmission electron microscopy. The LPSO phase in the Mg-Al-Gd system is found to form by stacking structural blocks, each of which consists of six close-packed atomic planes. In each of the structural blocks long-range ordering occurs for the constituent Mg, Al and Gd atoms, with enrichment of Gd atoms occurring in four consecutive planes of the six close-packed atomic planes. The ideal chemical composition of the structural block is determined to be Mg29Al3Gd4 (Mg-8.3 at.% Al-11.1 at.% Gd). However, the stacking of structural blocks is largely disordered. Strictly speaking, the technical term LPSO cannot be used to describe this phase because of the long-range ordering of the constituent atoms in each structural block. The crystal structure of the LPSO phase can thus be crystallographically described as one of the order-disorder structures, and either the C2/m, P3(1)12 or P3(2)12 space group is assigned when the simplest stacking of structural blocks is assumed. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据