4.7 Article

Characterization of NbC and (Nb, Ti)N nanoprecipitates in TRIP assisted multiphase steels

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 59, 期 19, 页码 7406-7415

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.08.012

关键词

Multiphase steel; NbC; (Nb, Ti)N; Precipitation; Transmission electron microscopy

资金

  1. Materials Innovation Institute [MC5.06280a]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiphase steels utilising composite strengthening may be further strengthened via grain refinement or precipitation by the addition of microalloying elements. In this study a Nb microalloyed steel comprising martensite, bainite and retained austenite has been studied. By means of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) we have investigated the size distribution and the structural properties of (Nb, Ti)N and NbC precipitates, their occurrence in the various steel phases, and their relationship with the Fe matrix. (Nb, Ti)N precipitates were found in ferrite, martensite, and bainite, while NbC precipitates were found only in ferrite. All NbC precipitates were found to be small (5-20 nm in size) and to have a face centred cubic (fcc) crystal structure with lattice parameter a = 4.36 +/- 0.05 angstrom. In contrast, the (Nb, Ti)N precipitates were found to have a broader size range (5-150 nm) and to have a fcc crystal structure with lattice parameter a = 8.09 +/- 0.05 angstrom. While the NbC precipitates were found to be randomly oriented, the (Nb, Ti)N precipitates have a welldefined Nishiyama Wasserman orientation relationship with the ferrite matrix. An analysis of the lattice mismatch suggests that the latter precipitates have a high potential for effective strengthening. Density functional theory calculations were performed for various stoichiometries of NbC(x) and Nb(x)Ti(y)N(z) phases and the comparison with experimental data indicates that both the carbides and nitrides are deficient in C and N content. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据