4.7 Article

Crystal plasticity finite-element analysis versus experimental results of pyramidal indentation into (001) fcc single crystal

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 1761-1771

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.042

关键词

Crystal plasticity; Micromechanical modeling; Indentation; Anisotropy; Ni alloys

资金

  1. ThyssenKrupp AG
  2. Bayer MaterialScience AG
  3. Salzgitter Mannesmann Forschung GmbH
  4. Robert Bosch GmbH
  5. Benteler Stahl/Rohr GmbH
  6. Bayer Technology Services GmbH
  7. state of North-Rhine Westphalia
  8. European Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pyramidal microindentation into the (00 1) surface of an face-centered cubic (fcc) single crystal made of a Ni-base superalloy is analyzed in experiment and crystal plasticity finite-element simulations. The resultant material pile-up at the surface reflects the material's symmetry and turns out to be insensitive to different loading scenarios as induced by (i) different azimuthal orientations of the pyramidal indenter, (ii) different indenter shapes (sphere or pyramid) and (iii) the elastic anisotropy. Experiments and simulations are in agreement and suggest that pile-up deformation patterns merely depend on the geometry of discrete slip systems but are invariant to different anisotropic stress distributions as induced by (i) (iii). The local adaption of pile-up to the pyramidal indenter leads to convex or concave indent shapes corresponding to the indenter orientation. We contrast the present findings for curved indent shapes of fcc single crystals to similar, well-known observations for quasi-isotropic polycrystals. Although phenomenologically similar in kind, the driving mechanisms are different: for the single crystal it is the discrete and anisotropic nature of plastic glide in certain slip systems; for isotropic polycrystals it is the rate of strain-hardening caused by the cumulative response of dislocations. (C) 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据