4.7 Article

Microstructure and strengthening mechanisms in cold-drawn pearlitic steel wire

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 59, 期 9, 页码 3422-3430

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.02.017

关键词

Microstructure; Strengthening mechanisms; Pearlitic steel wire

资金

  1. Danish National Research Foundation
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50911130230, 50890172]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strengthening mechanisms and strength structure relationships have been analyzed in a cold-drawn pearlitic steel with a structural scale in the nanometer range and a flow stress of about 3.5 GPa. The wires have been drawn up to a strain of 3.7 and the structures analyzed and quantified by transmission electron microscopy and high resolution electron microscopy. The mechanical properties have been determined by tensile testing. It is found that the interlamellar spacing and the thickness of the cementite lamellae are reduced in accordance with the changes in wire diameter up to a strain of 2.5. At a higher strain enhanced thinning of the cementite lamellae points to decomposition of the cementite and carbon enrichment of the ferrite lamellae. Dislocations are stored in the interior of the ferrite lamellae and their density increases to about 2 x 10(16) m(-2). A high dislocation density is also observed at the ferrite/cementite interface. Three strengthening mechanisms have been analyzed: (i) boundary strengthening, (ii) dislocation strengthening and (iii) solid solution hardening. The individual and combined contributions, based on an assumption of linear additivity, of these mechanisms to the wire strength have been estimated. Good agreement has been found between the estimated and the measured flow stresses, which is followed up by a discussion of structure and strengthening mechanisms with a view to extrapolation to larger strains, finer structures and larger stresses. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据