4.2 Article

An in vivo experimental study on osteopenia in diabetic rats

期刊

ACTA HISTOCHEMICA
卷 113, 期 6, 页码 619-625

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.acthis.2010.07.002

关键词

Streptozotocin; Diabetes mellitus; Osteopenia; L-Arginine; Immunohistochemistry; Rat

资金

  1. Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Catania, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteopenia is a significant problem associated with Diabetes mellitus. Osteopenia may result in an increased delay in healing of bone fractures and subsequently affect the quality of life. We evaluated the immunohistochemical localization of TRAIL and its receptor DR5 in the femoral bone of 10-week-old Sprague Dawley male rats treated with sesame oil (control, group 1), streptozotocin (STZ), a diabetes inducer (group 2), L-NAME, a general inhibitor of NOS activity (group 3), L-arginine (group 4), (arginine acts as a NO substrate) and iNOS immunostaining in group 1 and group 4. Histological and histochemical findings showed decreased growth of metaphyseal cartilage (which was thinner), decreased osteoid surface, and reduced mineral apposition rate in STZ- and L-NAME-treated rats. These findings confirm that bone formation is impaired in diabetic osteopenia. L-arginine supplementation seems to prevent diabetes-induced bone alterations and preserve the calcification process, allowing synthesis of new bone matrix. The immunohistochemical study revealed increased immunostaining of TRAIL and DR5 in osteoblastic cells of the diaphysis (pre-metaphysis) and epiphysis treated with STZ and L-NAME, related to activation of osteoblastic apoptotic death, while the group receiving L-arginine was comparable to the control group and the higher indications of iNOS activity that may reflect its induction by L-arginine administration. The action of L-arginine suggests that increased NO synthesis and availability is potentially useful for effective prevention and treatment of diabetic osteopenia. (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据