4.7 Article

Exploring the potentialities of using lignocellulosic fibres derived from three food by-products as constituents of biocomposites for food packaging

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 69, 期 -, 页码 110-122

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.01.028

关键词

Biocomposite; Lignocellulosic fiber; Tensile test; Water permeability; Extrusion

资金

  1. European Commission [FP7-265669]
  2. FEDER funds through the program COMPETE [PTDC/AGR-ALI/122741/2010]
  3. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [PEst-C/CTM/LA0025/2013, LA 25 - 2013-2014]
  4. Programa Operacional Regional do Norte (ON.2) through the project Matepro - Optimizing Materials and Processes [NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-000037 FEDER COMPETE]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/AGR-ALI/122741/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lignocellulosic fibres obtained by dry grinding of three different solid agro-residues, i.e. wheat straw, brewing spent grains and olive mills, were compared regarding their potential use as fillers in poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate) (PHBV) for food packaging applications. Differences found in their composition might have influenced their grinding ability, as observed with the difference of sizes, i.e. 109 mu m, 148 mu m and 46 mu m, respectively. Thereafter, composites structure was characterized regarding their morphology, fibre/matrix interaction, matrix molecular weight and crystallization behaviour. Poor fibre/matrix adhesion, degradation of PHBV polymer chains, and decrease of PHBV's crystallinity were evidence. Consequently, mechanical properties were degraded in presence of the fibres. Water vapour transfer rate of composites was increased with wheat straw fibres introduction while it was decreased for olive mills-based materials. Regarding the food packaging applications, PHBV/wheat straw fibres composites appeared as promising materials to reach the requirements of respiring food products, whereas PHBV/olive mills composites would be more adapted for water sensitive products. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据