4.5 Article

Carotid artery intima-media thickness and elasticity in relation to glucose tolerance

期刊

ACTA DIABETOLOGICA
卷 49, 期 3, 页码 215-223

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00592-011-0291-z

关键词

Arteriosclerosis; Carotid artery diseases; Diabetes; Glucose intolerance

资金

  1. Tampere University Hospital
  2. EVO of Kuopio University Hospital
  3. Research Council for Health at the Academy of Finland
  4. Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research
  5. Northern Ostrobotnia Hospital District

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The association between diabetes and subclinical atherosclerosis is well established. The effect of non-diabetic glucose intolerance on early atherosclerosis is not as straightforward, and the data regarding sex-related differences in this matter are limited. Therefore, our aim was to investigate these associations in men and women separately. We studied 1,304 Finnish men and women over 45 years of age who participated in the Finnish Health 2000 Survey. Ultrasonically determined carotid artery intima-media thickness and elasticity were used as markers of early atherosclerosis. Glucose tolerance was categorized according to the American Diabetes Association criteria for diabetes mellitus. Age-adjusted means for carotid artery intima-media thickness and elasticity indices were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with glucose tolerance status in both sexes. There was a trend of increasing early atherosclerosis with the worsening of glucose tolerance in men and women. These associations were weakened in both sexes after further adjustments for other cardiovascular risk factors. In women, but not in men, significant (P < 0.05) associations between glucose tolerance status and carotid artery elasticity were seen even after these further adjustments. Diabetes and non-diabetic glucose intolerance are associated with increased early carotid atherosclerosis compared with normal glucose tolerance in both sexes. Our results suggest that women with glucose intolerance may be in greater risk than men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据