4.5 Article

Effects of pentoxifylline and pentosan polysulphate combination therapy on diabetic neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus

期刊

ACTA DIABETOLOGICA
卷 46, 期 2, 页码 105-111

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s00592-008-0064-5

关键词

Diabetic neuropathy; Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy; Albuminuria; Pentosan polysulphate; Pentoxifylline

资金

  1. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [OTKA T-043788]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vascular dysfunction, including impaired perfusion has a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of microvascular complications in diabetes mellitus. Both pentoxifylline (PF) and pentosan polysulphate (PPS) are known to improve microcirculation. Antioxidant and antiproteinuric effects of PF are also known. In a placebo-controlled study, we determined the possible efficacy of PF-PPS combination therapy on diabetic neuropathy and nephropathy in type 2 diabetic patients. Patients in Verum group (n = 77) received PF-PPS infusions (100-100 mg/day) for 5 days. Control diabetics (Placebo group; n = 12) were given only saline infusions. Specialized cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests, vibration threshold values and urinary albumin excretion were assessed before and after therapy. In Verum group, autonomic score, indicating the severity of cardiac autonomic dysfunction, decreased after therapy (p a parts per thousand currency sign 0.001). Of the reflexes, deep breath and handgrip tests also improved after therapy (p a parts per thousand currency sign 0.001). Vibration threshold values, an indicator of the loss of sensory nerve function, were increased after therapy (p a parts per thousand currency sign 0.001). Results of cardiac autonomic tests and vibration threshold values remained unaltered in Placebo group. Majority of patients had normalbuminuria, which was not affected by PF-PPS. In conclusion, short-term PF-PPS therapy was effective on cardiovascular autonomic function and vibration perception, whereas it failed to reduce albuminuria within normal range in type 2 diabetic patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据