4.7 Article

Supercritical fluid extraction of essential oil from Leptocarpha rivularis using CO2

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 307-314

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.09.001

关键词

Antioxidant activity; Carbon dioxide; Essential oil; Supercritical extraction; Hydrodistillation; Leptocarpha rivularis

资金

  1. Chilean agency Fondecyt [1131066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supercritical CO2 extraction was applied to recover bioactive extract from L. rivularis leaves. A response surface design was applied to study the effects of temperature (38-52 degrees C) and pressure (10.8-19.2 MPa) on extraction yield, which varied from 2.91 to 5.05g/100 g d.s. Extraction yield was affected positively by the temperature (p < 0.01) and negatively by the pressure (p < 0.05). The negative effect of the pressure was attributed by a reflection of the increased repulsive solute-solvent interactions, or by effect of the pressure in decreasing the mass transfer parameters. Based on the response surface analysis, two pressures were selected at 52 degrees C: 10.8 and 19.2 MPa. The extract obtained at 19.2 MPa (0.61 mmol TE/kg) showed higher antioxidant activity than that at 10.8 MPa (0.35 mmol TE/kg). Quantitative analysis by GC-FID showed that the extract with higher antioxidant activity contained all three target terpenoids: alpha-thujone (5.36 mg/g), beta-caryophyllene (3.43 mg/g) and caryophyllene oxide (5.72 mg/g), while only caryophyllene oxide (11.02 mg/g) was found in the low pressure extracts. The yield with supercritical extraction (at 52 degrees C and 19.2 MPa) was 2.2 times higher than with hydrodistillation (2.11 g/100 g d.s.). Furthermore, supercritical extracts displayed higher antioxidant activity than hydrodistilled extract, compared by DPPH assay (0.60 and 0.46 mmol TE/kg, respectively) and bleaching beta-carotene assay (IC50 values of 1.99 and 10.10 mg/mL, respectively). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据