4.5 Article

Incidence and Determinants of Chronic Pruritus: A Population-based Cohort Study

期刊

ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA
卷 93, 期 5, 页码 532-537

出版社

ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA
DOI: 10.2340/00015555-1572

关键词

chronic pruritus; incidence; prevalence; longitudinal; predictors; determinants

资金

  1. foundation Friends of itch research in Germany (Forderverein Juckreizforschung e.V.)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epidemiological data on chronic pruritus (>6 weeks) in the general population are sparse. We aimed to provide data on the incidence and prevalence of chronic pruritus, and identify its determinants based on cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. A cohort of 1,190 participants from a cross-sectional baseline-study (response rate: 57.8%) was followed up after one year. The questionnaire assessed occurrence of chronic pruritus, medical, lifestyle and psychosocial variables. Incident chronic pruritus was defined as reported chronic pruritus at follow-up in those subjects free-of-the-symptom at baseline. Cross-sectional analyses of data from the follow-up assessments addressed potential associations of medical, lifestyle and psychosocial factors with prevalent chronic pruritus. Longitudinal analyses examined sociodemographic factors as potential predictors of incident chronic pruritus. The follow-up response rate was 83.1%. The mean age of subjects was 56 years, and 58% were female. The 12-month cumulative-incidence equalled 7.0% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 5.2-9.2%. Lifetime prevalence was 25.5% (95% CI 21.8-27.8%). Incidence was significantly associated with age. Determinants of prevalent chronic pruritus in multivariable analyses were: liver disease, asthma, eczema and dry skin within the medical domain, an elevated body mass index within the lifestyle domain and higher anxiety scores within the psychosocial domain. Findings suggest a considerable 12-month incidence and lifetime prevalence and provide important directions for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据