4.0 Article

Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the carbohydrate-binding region of the Streptococcus gordonii adhesin GspB

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S1744309110036535

关键词

GspB; glycoproteins; Streptococcus gordonii; sialic acid; adhesins; endocarditis; lectins

资金

  1. American Heart Association [09GRNT2220122]
  2. Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology
  3. VICTR
  4. NCRR/NIH [UL1 RR024975]
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs
  6. National Institutes of Health [AI041513, AI057433, GM61606]
  7. Vanderbilt Core [P30EY008126]
  8. Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  9. National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources
  10. National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  11. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  12. Michigan Economic Development Corporation
  13. Michigan Technology Tri-Corridor [085P1000817]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The carbohydrate-binding region of the bacterial adhesin GspB from Streptococcus gordonii strain M99 (GspB(BR)) was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified using affinity and size-exclusion chromatography. Separate sparse-matrix screening of GspB(BR) buffered in either 20 mM Tris pH 7.4 or 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5 resulted in different crystallographic behavior such that different precipitants, salts and additives supported crystallization of GspB(BR) in each buffer. While both sets of conditions supported crystal growth in space group P2(1)2(1)2(1), the crystals had distinct unit-cell parameters of a = 33.3, b = 86.7, c = 117.9 A for crystal form 1 and a = 34.6, b = 98.3, c = 99.0 A for crystal form 2. Additive screening improved the crystals grown in both conditions such that diffraction extended to beyond 2 A resolution. A complete data set has been collected to 1.3 A resolution with an overall R (merge) value of 0.04 and an R (merge) value of 0.33 in the highest resolution shell.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据