4.7 Article

The small covering factor of cold accretion streams

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01018.x

关键词

radiative transfer; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift; cosmology: theory

资金

  1. Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science
  2. NASA through Hubble Fellowship [HST-HF-51276.01-A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Theoretical models of galaxy formation predict that galaxies acquire most of their baryons via cold mode accretion. Observations of high-redshift galaxies, while showing ubiquitous outflows, have so far not revealed convincing traces of the predicted cold streams, which has been interpreted as a challenge for the current models. Using high-resolution, zoom-in smooth particle hydrodynamics simulations of Lyman break galaxy (LBG) haloes combined with ionizing radiative transfer, we quantify the covering factor of the cold streams at z = 2-4. We focus specifically on Lyman limit systems (LLSs) and damped Ly alpha absorbers (DLAs), which can be probed by absorption spectroscopy using a background galaxy or quasar sightline, and which are closely related to low-ionization metal absorbers. We show that the covering factor of these systems is relatively small and decreases with time. At z = 2, the covering factor of DLAs within the virial radius of the simulated galaxies is similar to 3 per cent (similar to 1 per cent within twice this projected distance), and arises principally from the galaxy itself. The corresponding values for LLSs are similar to 10 and 4 per cent. Because of their small covering factor compared to the order unity covering fraction expected for galactic winds, the cold streams are naturally dominated by outflows in stacked spectra. We conclude that the existing observations are consistent with the predictions of cold mode accretion, and outline promising kinematic and chemical diagnostics to separate out the signatures of galactic accretion and feedback.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据