4.5 Article

Epidemiology of the Rheumatic Diseases in Mexico. A Study of 5 Regions Based on the COPCORD Methodology

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 3-8

出版社

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.100951

关键词

EPIDEMIOLOGY; MEXICO; RHEUMATIC DISEASE; COPCORD METHODOLOGY

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT, National Council on Science and Technology)
  2. Abbot
  3. Novartis
  4. Roche
  5. Sanofi-Aventis
  6. Schering-Plough

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To estimate the prevalence of musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders and to describe predicting variables associated with rheumatic diseases in 5 regions of Mexico. Methods. This was a cross-sectional, community-based study performed in 5 regions in Mexico. The methodology followed the guidelines proposed by the Community Oriented Program for the Control of the Rheumatic Diseases (COPCORD). A standardized methodology was used at all sites, with trained personnel following a common protocol of interviewing adult subjects in their household. A positive case was defined as an individual with nontraumatic MSK pain of > 1 on a visual analog pain scale (0 to 10) during the last 7 days. All positive cases were referred to internists or rheumatologists for further clinical evaluation, diagnosis, and proper treatment. Results. The study included 19,213 individuals; 11,602 (68.8%) were female, and their mean age was 42.8 (SD 17.9) years. The prevalence of MSK pain was 25.5%, but significant variations (7.1% to 43.5%) across geographical regions occurred. The prevalence of osteoarthritis was 10.5%, back pain 5.8%, rheumatic regional pain syndromes 3.8%, rheumatoid arthritis 1.6%, fibromyalgia 0.7%, and gout 0.3%. The prevalence of MSK manifestations was associated with older age and female gender. Conclusion. The prevalence of MSK pain in our study was 25.5%. Geographic variations in the prevalence of MSK pain and specific diagnoses suggested a role for geographic factors in the prevalence of rheumatic diseases. (J Rheumatol 2011;38 Suppl 86:3-6; doi:10.3899/jrheum.100951)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据