4.6 Article

Adsorption Equilibrium and Dynamics of Fixed Bed Adsorption of CH4/N2 in Binder less Beads of 5A Zeolite

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 54, 期 24, 页码 6390-6399

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b01608

关键词

-

资金

  1. FEDER through COMPETE-Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade [UID/EQU/50020/2013, QREN-ON2-FEDER-NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-0000006, QREN-ON2-FEDER-NORTE-07-0162-FEDER-000050]
  2. FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sorption equilibrium of methane (CH4) and nitrogen (N-2) in binderless beads of 5A zeolite is presented between 305 and 373 K and pressures up to 3 bar in a static electronic microbalance. The adsorbed amount of CH4 and N-2 is around 1.6 and 1.02 mol/kg(ads), respectively, at 305 K and 3 bar. A comparison of these values with the ones in literature shows that the adsorption capacity of the 5A binderless beads is 20% higher than that of the 5A binder commercial materials. The CH4 and N-2 adsorption isotherms were fitted with the simplest Langmuir model with a prediction of the maximum amount adsorbed for both compounds of 5.0 mol/kg. The heats of sorption are -16.6 and -15.1 kJ/mol for CH4 and N-2, respectively. In the overall pressure and temperature range the isotherms of N-2 seems practically linear. However, it was observed that the experimental data of N-2 at low coverage (below 0.2 bar) deviates slightly from Type I isotherms. Thereafter, the binary sorption of CH4 and N2 has been investigated in a fixed bed adsorber at 313 and 343 K and total pressures up to 5 bar for 50(CH4)/50(N-2) and 75(CH4)//25(N-2) mixture ratios diluted in an inert helium stream. A mathematical model was formulated to compute the dynamic behavior of the fixed bed adsorber using the extended binary Langmuir model, showing close agreement with the measured binary breakthrough experiments in the partial pressure range of the components above 0.2 and below 3 bar.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据