4.6 Article

In Vivo Quantification of Bacterial Keratitis with Optical Coherence Tomography

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 52, 期 2, 页码 1093-1097

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6067

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. To quantify the human corneal inflammatory response in treated bacterial keratitis with long-wavelength anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). METHODS. Patients with clinically suspected bacterial keratitis were recruited from the corneal service at Southampton Eye Unit, UK. Patients underwent AS-OCT and slit-lamp examination on presentation (day 0) and days 3, 7, and 14 of treatment. Corneal thickness (CT) in the infiltrated area, infiltrate thickness (IT), and infiltrate width (IW) were measured on high-resolution AS-OCT scans. Mean values for each day and rates of change for each interval were calculated and compared (oneway ANOVA, paired t-test). RESULTS. Twenty-six eyes of 26 patients were recruited. Mean CT and IT on presentation were 905 mu m and 388 mu m, respectively. On days 3, 7, and 14, CT and IT decreased to 753 mu m and 320 mu m (P < 0.01), 678 mu m and 296 mu m (P < 0.01), and 584 mu m and 207 mu m (P < 0.01), respectively. Mean IW, 1498 mu m on presentation, did not change during treatment (P > 0.30). Mean daily rate of CT reduction was faster in the early (days 0-3) compared to late (days 7-14) phase (4.49% vs. 1.33%, P = 0.006). Mean daily rate of IT reduction was no different in early, middle, and late phases (5.41% vs. 1.19% vs. 3.38%, P > 0.01). In the late phase, IT decreased faster than CT (3.38% vs. 1.33%, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS. CT and IT decreased significantly by day 3 in resolving bacterial keratitis. The rapid early phase reduction in IT and CT was followed by rapid late phase IT reduction. This study demonstrates that serial AS-OCT examination can be used to monitor in vivo the clinical course of inflammatory disease. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52:1093-1097) DOI:10.1167/iovs.10-6067

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据