4.6 Article

Fabrication and Application of Catalytic Carbon Membranes for Hydrogen Production from Methanol Steam Reforming

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 54, 期 2, 页码 623-632

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie503094r

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20906063, 21176063, 21376037]
  2. National High-tech Research and Development Project of China [2012AA03A611]
  3. Liaoning Natural Science Foundation of China [20102170]
  4. Program for Liaoning Excellent Talents in University [LJQ2012010]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals [KF1107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel catalytic carbon membranes (CCMs) were fabricated by a mixture of phenolic resin and nanosized copper-based catalyst as precursor, through the processes of blending, compressing, molding, and pyrolysis. The thermal stability of precursors was studied by thermogravimetric analysis. The surface morphology, carbon structure, pore structure, and catalytic reduction property of CCMs were characterized. The CCMs were applied to assembly reactors for the reaction of hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming. Comparative study of catalytic performance was made among the reactors of CCMs, traditional fixed bed, and inert carbon membranes. The methanol steam reforming in CCMs was investigated by some crucial operation variables, including reaction time, reactor configuration, streaming mode, space velocity, and molar ratio. Results have shown that the as-synthesized catalyst and CCMs are stable enough to tolerate the present reaction condition for a long life expectancy. Although the carbon matrix is favorable for dispersing and improving the effective exposure of copper-based catalyst to reactant, the distinct pore diffusion in CCMs is notable. The performance reaches 95% for methanol conversion and 92% for hydrogen yield when a CCM-assembled reactor is operated under the condition of two outlet streams, space velocity at 9.6 h(-1), and methanol/steam molar ratio of 1:1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据