4.0 Article

Clinical Decision Making for Physical Therapists in Patient-Centered End-of-Life Care

期刊

TOPICS IN GERIATRIC REHABILITATION
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 10-17

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TGR.0b013e3181ff668a

关键词

end-of-life; hospice; neurodegenerative disease; oncology; palliative care; patient-centered care; rehabilitation in reverse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effective physical therapy intervention with persons approaching end of life requires a patient-centered model for clinical decision making. Unpredictable trajectories of short-term gain and inevitable decline challenge the therapist to carefully listen to the patient and family to understand their needs, assess pertinent physical and functional parameters, and initiate intervention within a palliative care or hospice reimbursement framework. This article describes 4 specific clinical decision-making models that can be effectively used to guide optimal physical therapy outcomes in end-of-life care. These include first, the Hypothesis-Oriented Algorithm for Clinicians II (Rothstein JM, Echternach JL, Riddle DL. The Hypothesis-Oriented Algorithm for Clinicians II (HOAC II): a guide for patient management. Phys Ther. 2003;83:455-470), second, a Framework for Rehabilitation of Neurodegenerative Diseases (Dal Bello-Haas V. A framework for rehabilitation of neurodegenerative diseases: Planning care and maximizing quality of life. Neurology Report. 2002;26;3:115-129), third, a Framework for Assessment in Oncology Rehabilitation (Gilchrist LS, Galantino ML, Wampler M, et al A framework for assessment in oncology rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2009;89:286-306), and fourth, Models of Practice in Palliative Care (Briggs R. Models for physical therapy practice in palliative medicine. Rehabilitation Oncology. 2000;18(2):18-19). The applicability of each of these models will be detailed as they pertain to optimal physical therapy intervention in palliative care and hospice settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据