3.8 Review

Predicting visual outcomes for macular disease using optical coherence tomography

期刊

SAUDI JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 145-158

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2011.01.003

关键词

Optical coherence; tomography; Surrogate endpoints; Visual acuity; Contrast sensitivity; Microperimetry

资金

  1. Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology at Moorfields Eye Hospital
  2. UCL Institute of Ophthalmology
  3. Carl Zeiss Meditec
  4. Optovue Inc
  5. Optos

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, the management of macular disease has undergone radical changes, in part because of new therapeutic approaches, but also due to the introduction of a new imaging modality - optical coherence tomography (OCT). The application of OCT imaging has clarified many aspects of chorioretinal disease pathophysiology and elucidated many hitherto unrecognized disease characteristics. From an early stage in its development, OCT has also been revolutionary in attempting to extract clinically useful measurements from image data in an automated fashion. As a result, OCT-derived measurements of retinal thickness have been rapidly embraced in clinical and research settings. However, as knowledge of OCT image analysis has developed, it has become increasingly clear that even accurate measurements of retinal thickness may fail to predict visual outcomes for many diseases. As a result, the focus of much current clinical imaging research is on the identification of other OCT-derived anatomic biomarkers predictive of visual outcomes such biomarkers could serve as surrogate endpoints in clinical trials and provide prognostic information in clinical practice. In this review, we begin by highlighting the importance of accurate visual function assessment and describing the fundamentals of OCT image evaluation, before describing the current state-of-the-art with regard to predicting visual outcomes, for a variety of macular diseases, using OCT. (C) 2011 King Saud University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据