4.4 Article

Mitigation of X-ray damage in macromolecular crystallography by submicrometre line focusing

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1107/S0907444913009335

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [0650547]
  2. US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Biological and Environmental Research [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. US DOE, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  4. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0650547] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reported here are measurements of the penetration depth and spatial distribution of photoelectron (PE) damage excited by 18.6 keV X-ray photons in a lysozyme crystal with a vertical submicrometre line-focus beam of 0.7 mm full-width half-maximum (FWHM). The experimental results determined that the penetration depth of PEs is 5 +/- 0.5 mu m with a monotonically decreasing spatial distribution shape, resulting in mitigation of diffraction signal damage. This does not agree with previous theoretical predication that the mitigation of damage requires a peak of damage outside the focus. A new improved calculation provides some qualitative agreement with the experimental results, but significant errors still remain. The mitigation of radiation damage by line focusing was measured experimentally by comparing the damage in the X-ray-irradiated regions of the submicrometre focus with the large-beam case under conditions of equal exposure and equal volumes of the protein crystal, and a mitigation factor of 4.4 +/- 0.4 was determined. The mitigation of radiation damage is caused by spatial separation of the dominant PE radiation-damage component from the crystal region of the line-focus beam that contributes the diffraction signal. The diffraction signal is generated by coherent scattering of incident X-rays (which introduces no damage), while the overwhelming proportion of damage is caused by PE emission as X-ray photons are absorbed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据