4.4 Article

Structures of the γ-class carbonic anhydrase homologue YrdA suggest a possible allosteric switch

期刊

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S0907444912017210

关键词

-

资金

  1. World Class Institute (WCI) Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of Korea (MEST) [WCI 2009-002]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea
  4. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0008560, 2011-0003900]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012-90001865, 2010-0008560] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The YrdA protein shows high sequence similarity to gamma-class carbonic anhydrase (gamma-CA) proteins and is classified as part of the gamma-CA protein family. However, its function has not been fully elucidated as it lacks several of the conserved residues that are considered to be necessary for gamma-CA catalysis. Interestingly, a homologue of gamma-CA from Methanosarcina thermophila and a beta-carboxysomal gamma-CA from a beta-cyanobacterium have shown that these catalytic residues are not always conserved in gamma-CAs. The crystal structure of YrdA from Escherichia coli (ecYrdA) is reported here in two crystallographic forms. The overall structure of ecYrdA is also similar to those of the gamma-CAs. One loop around the putative catalytic site shows a number of alternative conformations. A His residue (His70) on this loop coordinates with, or is reoriented from, the catalytic Zn2+ ion; this is similar to the conformations mediated by an Asp residue on the catalytic loops of beta-CA proteins. One Trp residue (Trp171) also adopts two alternative conformations that may be related to the spatial positions of the catalytic loop. Even though significant CA activity could not be detected using purified ecYrdA, these structural features have potential functional implications for gamma-CA-related proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据