4.4 Article

REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures

期刊

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S0907444911001314

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [064405/Z/01/A]
  2. CCP4 grant
  3. Netherlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO)
  4. BBSRC
  5. BBSRC [BB/F0202281]
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F020228/1, BB/F001134/1, BB/F020805/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A025_1012] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Wellcome Trust [064405/Z/01/A] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  9. BBSRC [BB/F001134/1, BB/F020805/1, BB/F020228/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. MRC [MC_UP_A025_1012] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes various components of the macromolecular crystallographic refinement program REFMAC5, which is distributed as part of the CCP4 suite. REFMAC5 utilizes different likelihood functions depending on the diffraction data employed (amplitudes or intensities), the presence of twinning and the availability of SAD/SIRAS experimental diffraction data. To ensure chemical and structural integrity of the refined model, REFMAC5 offers several classes of restraints and choices of model parameterization. Reliable models at resolutions at least as low as 4 angstrom can be achieved thanks to low-resolution refinement tools such as secondary-structure restraints, restraints to known homologous structures, automatic global and local NCS restraints, 'jelly-body' restraints and the use of novel long-range restraints on atomic displacement parameters (ADPs) based on the Kullback-Leibler divergence. REFMAC5 additionally offers TLS parameterization and, when high-resolution data are available, fast refinement of anisotropic ADPs. Refinement in the presence of twinning is performed in a fully automated fashion. REFMAC5 is a flexible and highly optimized refinement package that is ideally suited for refinement across the entire resolution spectrum encountered in macromolecular crystallography.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据