4.2 Article

Philosophy for the Rest of Cognitive Science

期刊

TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 425-437

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01143.x

关键词

Explanation; Dynamical systems; Representation; Mechanism; Philosophy of science

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD-01994] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  3. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0925373] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cognitive science has always included multiple methodologies and theoretical commitments. The philosophy of cognitive science should embrace, or at least acknowledge, this diversity. Bechtel's (2009a) proposed philosophy of cognitive science, however, applies only to representationalist and mechanist cognitive science, ignoring the substantial minority of dynamically oriented cognitive scientists. As an example of nonrepresentational, dynamical cognitive science, we describe strong anticipation as a model for circadian systems (Stepp & Turvey, 2009). We then propose a philosophy of science appropriate to nonrepresentational, dynamical cognitive science.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据