4.6 Article

High-Resolution Homozygosity Mapping Is a Powerful Tool to Detect Novel Mutations Causative of Autosomal Recessive RP in the Dutch Population

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 52, 期 5, 页码 2227-2239

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6185

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundation Fighting Blindness USA [BR-GE-0606-0349-RAD]
  2. Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Oogziekenhuis Rotterdam Prof. dr. H.J. Flieringa Foundation [2005-13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. To determine the genetic defects underlying autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa (arRP) in the Dutch population and in a subset of patients originating from other countries. The hypothesis was that, because there has been little migration over the past centuries in certain areas of The Netherlands, a significant fraction of Dutch arRP patients carry their genetic defect in the homozygous state. METHODS. High-resolution genome-wide SNP genotyping on SNP arrays and subsequent homozygosity mapping were performed in a large cohort of 186 mainly nonconsanguineous arRP families living in The Netherlands. Candidate genes residing in homozygous regions were sequenced. RESULTS. In similar to 94% of the affected individuals, large homozygous sequences were identified in their genome. In 42 probands, at least one of these homozygous regions contained one of the 26 known arRP genes. Sequence analysis of the corresponding genes in each of these patients revealed 21 mutations and two possible pathogenic changes, 14 of which were novel. All mutations were identified in only a single family, illustrating the genetic diversity within the Dutch population. CONCLUSIONS. This report demonstrates that homozygosity mapping is a powerful tool for identifying the genetic defect underlying genetically heterogeneous recessive disorders like RP, even in populations with little consanguinity. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:2227-2239) DOI:10.1167/iovs.10-6185

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据