4.2 Article

Analysis of Alkaloids in Pharmaceutical Preparations Containing Kushen by Capillary Electrophoresis with Application of Experimental Design and a Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Approach

期刊

ACTA CHROMATOGRAPHICA
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 445-457

出版社

AKADEMIAI KIADO ZRT
DOI: 10.1556/AChrom.22.2010.3.8

关键词

capillary electrophoresis; experimental design; multiple linear regression; radial basis function neural network; matrine; oxymatrine

资金

  1. Shandong Provincial International Cooperation Project for Excellent Teachers in Chinese Universities
  2. Postdoctoral foundation of Yantai University [HY03B12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple and rapid capillary electrophoretic procedure for analysis of matrine and oxymatrine in Kushen medicinal preparations has been developed and optimized. Orthogonal design was used to optimize the separation and detection conditions for the two active components. Phosphate concentration, applied potential, organic modifier content, and buffer pH were selected as variable conditions. The optimized background electrolyte contained 70 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate and 30% acetonitrile at pH 5.5; the separation potential was 20 kV. Each analysis was complete within 5 min. Regression equations revealed linear relationships (r > 0.999) between peak area and amount for each component. The detection limits were 1.29 mu g mL(-1) for matrine and 1.48 mu g mL(-1) for oxymatrine. The levels of the two active compounds in two kinds of traditional Chinese medicinal preparation were easily determined with recoveries of 96.57-106.26%. In addition, multiple linear regression and a non-linear model using a radial basis function neural network approach were constructed for prediction of the migration time of oxymatrine. The predicted results were in good agreement with the experimental values, indicating that a radial basis function neural network is a potential means of prediction of separation time in capillary electrophoresis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据