4.1 Article

Initial experience with remote magnetic navigation for left ventricular lead placement

期刊

ACTA CARDIOLOGICA
卷 64, 期 4, 页码 467-475

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.2143/AC.64.4.2041611

关键词

Magnetic navigation; cardiac resynchronization therapy; biventricular pacemaker; guidewire navigation

资金

  1. Stereotaxis Inc., USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background - A novel magnetic navigation system allows remote steering of guidewires and catheters. This system may be used for left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We sought to evaluate the feasibility and safety of magnetic guidewire navigation for CRT procedures. Methods - 123 consecutive patients underwent CRT implantation/revision procedures (including pacemaker upgrades in n = 22 and left ventricular lead placement after dislocation in n = 4 patients). Left ventricular lead placement in a coronary sinus side branch was performed either conventionally or using magnetic navigation. The magnetic navigation system (Niobe) consists of two permanent magnets creating a steerable magnetic field. Guidewires with integrated magnets align to the magnetic field and were used for over-the-wire implantation of pacemaker leads in the coronary sinus. Patients were assigned to conventional (n = 93) or magnetic (n = 30) navigation according to room availability. Venography of the coronary venous system was performed to select a target vessel for lead implantation. Results - Guidewire access to the target vessel was achieved in 100% using magnetic navigation compared to 87% with the conventional approach (P < 0.05). Implantation success rates, total procedure and fluoroscopy times did not differ significantly between groups. No periprocedural death and no intraoperative device dysfunction occurred in either group. The magnetic guidewire ruptured in one patient. Conclusion - Left ventricular lead placement using magnetic guidewire navigation to engage the desired coronary sinus side branch can be successfully performed for CRT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据