4.5 Article

Explaining and predicting individually experienced liking of berry fractions by the hTAS2R38 taste receptor genotype

期刊

APPETITE
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 85-96

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.10.023

关键词

Astringency; Berry fractions; Bitterness; Food choice motives; Health concern; hTAS2R38; Liking; Polyphenol extracts; Sourness

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [116165, 252005, 256176]
  2. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  3. Varsinais-Suomi Regional Fund
  4. Food Research Foundation in Finland
  5. Finnish Food Development Cluster Program
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [252005, 256176, 252005, 256176, 116165, 116165] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The roles of taste and astringent properties, food choice motives and health concerns in liking of bilberry and crowberry samples were studied using a sensory panel prescreened for the hTAS2R38 taste receptor genotype. The subjects rated the intensity of sourness, bitterness and two astringent properties (soft, velvety and rough, puckering) of all berry samples. They also scored the liking of juice fractions and completed a food choice motive and health concern questionnaire. Regression models were used to combine different data sets and to predict liking of the extracts. Sourness contributed positively to the liking of berry fractions, and bitterness and rough astringency were negative factors. The hTAS2R38 genotype affected the liking of polyphenol-rich extracts, which were significantly bitter and astringent. Based on the genotype grouping of subjects, PAV homozygotes gave lower ratings to the attributes than AVI homozygotes. In contrast, PAV homozygotes were predicted to dislike the extracts notably more than AVI homozygotes. Health concern and food choice motives related to health and weight control had significant roles in individual liking of juice fractions. Our results indicate that mood was more important to the PAV homozygotes than to the AVI homozygotes. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据