4.5 Article

Resemblance of dietary intakes of snacks, sweets, fruit, and vegetables among mother-child dyads from low income families

期刊

APPETITE
卷 59, 期 2, 页码 316-323

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.05.014

关键词

Mother-child dyads; Preschool children; Low-income; Head Start; Diet resemblance; Fruit; Vegetables; Snacks; Sweets

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [RO1 CA102671]
  2. USDA Hatch Project [LAB 93951]
  3. USDA/Agricultural Research Service [58-6250-6001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to determine the correlation between intake of snacks, sweets, fruit, vegetables, and energy in low-income mother-child dyads. This was a secondary analysis of data collected from Head Start centers in Houston, Texas and Birmingham, Alabama. Twenty four hour dietary recalls for one weekend day were collected from mother (mean 31.8 yrs [range: 20.1-72.4 yrs])-child (mean 4.4 yrs [range 2.8-5.8 yrs]) dyads (N = 650). Means +/- SD were calculated for intake of food categories and energy. Pearson's partial correlation coefficients were used to detect associations between the intakes of the dyads. Main outcome measures were the correlations between the intake of snacks, sweets, fruit, vegetables, and energy in the mother-child dyads. Partial correlations showed that children's intake of snacks, sweets, fruit, vegetables, and energy were all correlated with the mother's intake of these foods/energy (all p < 0.001). Children's intake of fruit was correlated with the mother's intake of vegetables (p < 0.001); children's energy intake was correlated with mother's intake of sweets, fruit, and vegetables (all p < 0.001). It is important that food and nutrition professionals provide the guidance needed that encourages intake of nutrient-dense snacks and fruit and vegetables in mothers so they can model healthier food consumption behaviors for their children. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据