4.8 Article

Pore size distribution of bioresorbable films using a 3-D diffusion NMR method

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 2762-2768

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.014

关键词

Porosity; Microstructure; Pore size distribution; SEM (scanning electron microscopy); Polyglycolic acid

资金

  1. Marie Curie IRG grant (MMD-TIAN)
  2. Israel Science Foundation (ISF)
  3. Colton family scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pore size distribution (PSD) within porous biomaterials is an important microstructural feature for assessing their biocompatibility, longevity and drug release kinetics. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is the most common method used to obtain the PSD of soft biomaterials. The method is highly invasive and user dependent, since it requires fracturing of the sample and then considers only the small portion that the user had acquired in the image. In the current study we present a novel nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) method as an alternative method for estimation of PSD in soft porous materials. This noninvasive 3-D diffusion NMR method considers the entire volume of the specimen and eliminates the user's need to choose a specific field of view. Moreover, NMR does not involve exposure to ionizing radiation and can potentially have preclinical and clinical uses. The method was applied on four porous 50/50 poly(DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid) bioresorbable films with different porosities, which were created using the freeze-drying of inverted emulsions technique. We show that the proposed NMR method is able to address the main limitations associated with SEM-based PSD estimations by being non-destructive, depicting the full volume of the specimens and not being dependent on the magnification factor. Upon comparison, both methods yielded a similar PSD in the smaller pore size range (1-25 mu m), while the NMR-based method provided additional information on the larger pores (25-50 mu m). (C) 2014 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据