4.8 Article

Osteochondral tissue regeneration through polymeric delivery of DNA encoding for the SOX trio and RUNX2

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 4103-4112

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.05.011

关键词

Polymeric gene delivery; OPF; bPEI-HA; SOX trio; RUNX-2

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R21 AR56076, R01 AR57083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Native osteochondral repair is often inadequate owing to the inherent properties of the tissue, and current clinical repair strategies can result in healing with a limited lifespan and donor site morbidity. This work investigates the use of polymeric gene therapy to address this problem by delivering DNA encoding for transcription factors complexed with the branched poly(ethylenimine)-hyaluronic acid (bPEI-HA) delivery vector via a porous oligo[poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate] hydrogel scaffold. To evaluate the potential of this approach, a bilayered scaffold mimicking native osteochondral tissue organization was loaded with DNA/bPEI-HA complexes. Next, bilayered implants either unloaded or loaded in a spatial fashion with bPEI-HA and DNA encoding for either Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) or SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 5, 6, and 9 (the SOX trio), to generate bone and cartilage tissues respectively, were fabricated and implanted in a rat osteochondral defect. At 6 weeks post-implantation, microcomputed tomography analysis and histological scoring were performed on the explants to evaluate the quality and quantity of tissue repair in each group. The incorporation of DNA encoding for RUNX2 in the bone layer of these scaffolds significantly increased bone growth. Additionally, a spatially loaded combination of RUNX2 and SOX trio DNA loading significantly improved healing relative to empty hydrogels or either factor alone. Finally, the results of this study suggest that subchondral bone formation is necessary for correct cartilage healing. (C) 2014 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据