4.8 Article

Size effect of amphiphilic poly(γ-glutamic acid) nanoparticles on cellular uptake and maturation of dendritic cells in vivo

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 8894-8901

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.010

关键词

Dendritic cells; Lymph nodes; Nanoparticles; Particle size; Vaccine

资金

  1. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23225004, 13J00745] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We prepared size-regulated nanoparticles (NPs) composed of amphiphilic poly(gamma-glutamic acid) (gamma-PGA). In this study, 40, 100 and 200 nm gamma-PGA-graft-L-phenylalanine ethylester (gamma-PGA-Phe) NPs were employed. The size of NPs significantly influenced the uptake and activation behaviors of antigen-presenting cells (APCs). When 40 nm gamma-PGA-Phe NPs were applied to these cells in vitro, they were highly activated compared with 100 and 200 nm NPs, while cellular uptake was size dependent. The size of the gamma-PGA-Phe NPs also significantly affected their migration to the lymph nodes and uptake behavior of NPs by dendritic cells (DCs) in vivo. The 40 nm gamma-PGA-Phe NPs migrated more rapidly to the lymph nodes and were taken up by a greater number of DCs compared with 100 and 200 nm NPs. On the other hand, when the amount of gamma-PGA-Phe NPs taken up per DC was evaluated, it was higher for 100 and 200 nm NPs than for 40 nm NPs, which suggests that the larger gamma-PGA-Phe NPs can deliver a large amount of antigen to a single DC compared with smaller NPs. Furthermore, when examined the maturation of DCs in lymph nodes, 40 nm gamma-PGA-Phe NPs efficiently stimulated DCs. These results suggest that the activation, uptake behavior by APCs, migration to lymph nodes, and DC maturation can be controlled by the size of gamma-PGA-Phe NPs. (C) 2013 Acts Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据