4.8 Article

Mathematical modeling of drug release from nanostructured porous Si: Combining carrier erosion and hindered drug diffusion for predicting release kinetics

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 9, 期 9, 页码 8346-8353

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.007

关键词

Mesoporous Si; Controlled delivery; Mathematical modeling; Surface chemistry; Drug release

资金

  1. Russell Berrie Nanotechnology Institute (RBNI)
  2. Lorry I. Lokey Interdisciplinary Center for Life Sciences and Engineering (LSE)
  3. RBNI Scholarship for Outstanding Graduate Students

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel, empirical, macroscopic model is developed to describe the release of a model anticancer drug, Mitoxantrone, from native and chemically modified porous Si (PSi) thin films. Drug release from these carriers results from a combination of two mechanisms, i.e. out-diffusion of the drug molecules and erosion of the Si scaffold. Thus, the proposed mathematical model adapts the Crank model to lump the effects of temporal changes in molecular interactions and carrier scaffold erosion into a comprehensive model of hindered drug diffusion from nanoscale porous systems. Careful characterization of pore size, porosity, surface area, drug loading, as well as Si scaffold degradation profiles, measured over the same time-scale as drug release, are incorporated into the model parameter estimation. A comparison of the experimental and model results shows accurate representation of the data, emphasizing the reliability of the model. The proposed model shows that drug diffusivity values significantly vary with time for the two studied carriers, which are ascribed to the distinctive role of the prevailing physical mechanisms in each system. Finally, secondary validation of the proposed model is demonstrated by showing adequate fit to published data of the release of dexamethasone from similar mesoporous Si carriers. (C) 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据