4.8 Article

Preconditioned 70S30C bioactive glass foams promote osteogenesis in vivo

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 9169-9182

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.014

关键词

Bioactive glass; 70S30C; Bone regeneration; Rat tibia; X-ray computed tomography

资金

  1. University of Ulster at Coleraine
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I02249X/1, EP/I020861/1]
  3. Research Complex at Harwell
  4. EPSRC [EP/I020861/1, EP/I02249X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I020861/1, EP/I02249X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioactive glass scaffolds (70S30C; 70% SiO2 and 30% CaO) produced by a sol-gel foaming process are thought to be suitable matrices for bone tissue regeneration. Previous in vitro data showed bone matrix production and active remodelling in the presence of osteogenic cells. Here we report their ability to act as scaffolds for in vivo bone regeneration in a rat tibial defect model, but only when preconditioned. Pre-treatment methods (dry, pre-wetted or preconditioned without blood) for the 70S30C scaffolds were compared against commercial synthetic bone grafts (NovaBone (R) and Actifuse (R)). Poor bone ingrowth was found for both dry and wetted sol-gel foams, associated with rapid increase in pH within the scaffolds. Bone ingrowth was quantified through histology and novel micro-CT image analysis. The percentage bone ingrowth into dry, wetted and preconditioned 70S30C scaffolds at 11 weeks were 10 +/- 1%, 21 +/- 2% and 39 +/- 4%, respectively. Only the preconditioned sample showed above 60% material-bone contact, which was similar to that in NovaBone and Actifuse. Unlike the commercial products, preconditioned 70S30C scaffolds degraded and were replaced with new bone. The results suggest that bioactive glass compositions should be redesigned if sol-gel scaffolds are to be used without preconditioning to avoid excess calcium release. (C) 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据