4.8 Article

Thermosensitive β-cyclodextrin modified poly(ε-caprolactone)-poly( ethylene glycol)-poly(ε-caprolactone) micelles prolong the anti-inflammatory effect of indomethacin following local injection

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 6953-6963

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.02.005

关键词

Thermosensitive micelle; beta-Cyclodextrin; Poly(epsilon-caprolactone); Indomethacin; Inflammation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Funds for Excellent Young Scholar [81222047]
  2. Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for New Drugs Creation [2011ZX 09501-001-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel biodegradable and injectable in situ gel-forming controlled drug delivery system based on thermosensitive beta-cyclodextrin-modified poly(epsilon-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(epsilon-caprolactone) co-polymer (PCEC-beta-CD) was studied in this work. The drug encapsulating capacity has been improved by introducing beta-CD bound to the PCEC co-polymer. The prepared PCEC-beta-CD co-polymers self-assembled in water to form micelles, and underwent a temperature-dependent gel-sol transition, which was in the form of a flowing injectable solution at low temperatures but became a non-flowing gel at around physiological body temperature. Furthermore, a small hydrophobic drug molecule indomethacin (IND) was successfully encapsulated in PCEC-beta-CD micelles by dialysis at a high encapsulation efficiency and drug loading capacity. The IND-loaded micelles (IND-M) exhibited controlled release in vitro. Additionally, a pharmacodynamic study in vivo based on both the carrageenan-induced acute and complete Freund's adjuvant-induced adjuvant arthritis models indicated that sustained therapeutic efficacy could be achieved through subcutaneous injection of IND-loaded micelles. A significant improvement in the anti-inflammatory effect of IND in rats occurred on encapsulation in PCEC-beta-CD micelles. (C) 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据