4.8 Article

Contact nanofatigue shows crack growth in amorphous calcium phosphate on Ti, Co-Cr and Stainless steel

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 5788-5794

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.11.011

关键词

Nanoindentation; Nanofatigue testing; Hydroxyapatite; Biomedical implants; Coatings

资金

  1. ARC Discovery Grant [DP0774251]
  2. Rowden White Fund
  3. ARC LIEF [LE0775715]
  4. Marie Curie Fellowship [PIRG05-GA-2009-249306]
  5. Australian Research Council [LE0775715] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fatigue testing of load-bearing coated implants is usually very time-consuming and so a new contact nanofatigue test using a nanoindenter has been evaluated. A cube comer indenter provided the fastest indication of failure, through crack formation, compared to a spherical indenter. Contact nanofatigue was performed on a sintered hydroxyapatite and then on amorphous calcium phosphate splats produced on titanium, stainless steel and Co-Cr surfaces, made either at room temperature or on 250 degrees C preheated surfaces. Sintered hydroxyapatite showed continual plastic deformation, but this is not that apparent for splats on metal surfaces. Substrate preheating was found to induce cracking in splats, explained by greater thermal residual stresses. Endurance during contact nanofatigue, measured as time to crack formation, was the lowest for splats on titanium followed by Co-Cr and stainless steel. The splat on titanium showed both cracking and plastic deformation during testing. Good agreement has been reached with previous studies with cracking directed to the substrate without splat delamination. Contact nanofatigue with the nanoindenter easily and quickly identifies cracking events that previously required detection with acoustic emission, and shows good feasibility for mechanical testing of discs and splats produced by thermal spraying, spray forming, laser-ablation, aerosol jet and ink jet printing. (C) 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据