4.8 Article

Anti-infective and osteointegration properties of silicon nitride, poly(ether ether ketone), and titanium implants

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 8, 期 12, 页码 4447-4454

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.07.038

关键词

Silicon nitride; Poly(ether ether ketone); Titanium; Orthopedic implants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silicon nitride (Si3N4) is an industrial ceramic used in spinal fusion and maxillofacial reconstruction. Maximizing bone formation and minimizing bacterial infection are desirable attributes in orthopedic implants designed to adhere to living bone. This study has compared these attributes of Si3N4 implants with implants made from two other orthopedic biomaterials, i.e. poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) and titanium (Ti). Dense implants made of Si3N4, PEEK, or Ti were surgically implanted into matching rat calvarial defects. Bacterial infection was induced with an injection of 1 x 10(4) Staphylococcus epidermidis. Control animals received saline only. On 3, 7, and 14 days, and 3 months post-surgery four rats per time period and material were killed, and calvariae were examined to quantify new bone formation and the presence or absence of bacteria. Quantitative evaluation of osteointegration to adjacent bone was done by measuring the resistance to implant push-out (n = 8 rats each for Ti and PEEK, and n = 16 rats for Si3N4). Three months after surgery in the absence of bacterial injection new bone formation around Si3N4 was similar to 69%, compared with 24% and 36% for PEEK and Ti, respectively. In the presence of bacteria new bone formation for Si3N4, Ti, and PEEK was 41%, 26%, and 21%, respectively. Live bacteria were identified around PEEK (88%) and Ti (21%) implants, whereas none were present adjacent to Si3N4. Push-out strength testing demonstrated statistically superior bone growth onto Si3N4 compared with Ti and PEEK. Si3N4 bioceramic implants demonstrated superior new bone formation and resistance to bacterial infection compared with Ti and PEEK. (c) 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据