4.8 Article

Simultaneous regeneration of articular cartilage and subchondral bone induced by spatially presented TGF-beta and BMP-4 in a bilayer affinity binding system

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 3283-3293

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.05.014

关键词

Affinity-binding scaffold; Bilayer; TGF-beta 1; BMP-4; Subchondral defect

资金

  1. Azrieli Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subchondral defect repair is a multitask challenge requiring the simultaneous regeneration of cartilage and bone. Herein, we describe the features of a hydrogel system designed to simultaneously induce the endogenous regeneration of hyaline cartilage and subchondral bone. The system was constructed as two layers, spatially presenting the chondroinductive transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) in one layer and the osteoinductive bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4) in a second layer, via affinity binding to the matrix. Human mesenchymal stem cells seeded in the bilayer system differentiated into chondrocytes and osteoblasts in the respective layers, confirming the spatial presentation and prolonged activity of TGF-beta 1 and BMP-4. Administration of the bilayer system with affinity-bound TGF-beta 1 and BMP-4 (with no cells) into a subchondral defect in rabbits induced endogenous regeneration of articular cartilage and the subchondral bone underneath within 4 weeks. Cartilage extracellular matrix proteoglycans were found in the top layer, with no mineralization, whereas the layer underneath consisted of newly formed woven bone. The results indicate that stem cells migrating into the defect are able to sense the biological cues spatially presented in the hydrogel and respond by differentiation into the appropriate cell lineage. The strategy has a real translational potential for repairing osteochondral defects in humans as it is acellular and can be implanted via a minimally invasive method. (C) 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据