4.8 Article

Effective inhibition of the early copper ion burst release with ultra-fine grained copper and single crystal copper for intrauterine device application

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 886-896

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.10.018

关键词

Copper; Corrosion; Metal ion release; Biocompatibility; In vitro test

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB619102]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2011AA030101, 2011AA030103]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HEUCFZ1017]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51041004]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [ZD201012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To solve the main problems of existing coarse grained copper (CG Cu) intrauterine devices (IUD)-namely burst release and a low transfer efficiency of the cupric ions during usage-ultra-fine grained copper (UFG Cu) and single crystal copper (SC Cu) have been investigated as potential substitutes. Their corrosion properties with CG Cu as a control have been studied in simulated uterine fluid (SUF) under different conditions using electrochemical measurement methods. Long-term immersion of UFG Cu, SC Cu and CG Cu samples in SUF at 37 degrees C have been studied for 300 days. A lower copper ion burst release and a higher efficiency release of cupric ions were observed for UFG Cu and SC Cu compared with CG Cu in the first month of immersion and 2 months later. The respective corrosion mechanisms for UFG Cu, SC Cu and CG Cu in SUF are proposed. In vitro biocompatibility tests show a better cellular response to UFG Cu and SC Cu than CG Cu. In terms of instantaneous corrosion behavior, long-term corrosion performance and in vitro biocompatibility, the three pure copper materials follow the order: UFG Cu > SC Cu > CG Cu, which indicates that UFG Cu could be the most suitable candidate material for intrauterine devices. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据