4.8 Article

First quantitative assay of alpha-Gal in soft tissues: Presence and distribution of the epitope before and after cell removal from xenogeneic heart valves

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 1728-1734

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.030

关键词

Xenotransplantation; Alpha-Gal quantification; Xenogenic antigens; Cell-removal procedure; Heart valves

资金

  1. Regione Veneto [RSF 286/08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decellularized xenograft heart valves might be the ideal scaffolds for tissue engineered heart valves as the alternative to the currently used biological and mechanical prostheses. However, removal of the alpha-Gal epitope is a prerequisite to avoid hyperacute rejection of untreated xenograft material. The aim of this study was to develop an ELISA soft-tissue assay for alpha-Gal quantification in xenograft heart valves before and after a detergent-based (TriCol) or equivalent cell removal procedure. Leaflets from porcine valves were enzymatically digested to expose the epitope and reacted with the alpha-Gal monoclonal antibody M86 for its recognition. Rabbit erythrocytes were used as a reference for the quantification of alpha-Gal. Native aortic and pulmonary leaflets exhibited different epitope concentration: 4.33 x 10(11) vs. 7.12 x 10(11)/10 mg wet tissue (p < 0.0001). Sampling of selected zones in native valves revealed a different alpha-Gal distribution within and among different leaflets. The pattern was consistent with immunofluorescence analysis and was unrelated to microvessel density distribution. After Tri-Cal treatment alpha-Gal was no longer detectable in both pulmonary and aortic decellularized valves, confirming the ability of this method to remove both cells and alpha-Gal antigen. These results hold promise for a reliable quantitative evaluation of alpha-Gal in decellularized valves obtained from xenograft material for tissues engineering purposes. Additionally, this method is applicable to further evaluate currently used xenograft bioprostheses. (C) 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据