4.8 Article

Melt-derived bioactive glass scaffolds produced by a gel-cast foaming technique

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 1807-1816

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.041

关键词

Bioactive glass; Porous scaffolds; Gel-casting; Bone tissue regeneration; Artificial bone graft

资金

  1. Philip Leverhulme Prize
  2. EPSRC [EP/I020861/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I020861/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous melt-derived bioactive glass scaffolds with interconnected pore networks suitable for bone regeneration were produced without the glass crystallizing. ICIE 16(49.46% SiO2, 36.27% CaO, 6.6% Na2O, 1.07% P2O5 and 6.6% K2O, in mol.%) was used as it is a composition designed not to crystallize during sintering. Glass powder was made into porous scaffolds by using the gel-cast foaming technique. All variables in the process were investigated systematically to devise an optimal process. Interconnect size was quantified using mercury porosimetry and X-ray microtomography (mu CT). The reagents, their relative quantities and thermal processing protocols were all critical to obtain a successful scaffold. Particularly important were particle size (a modal size of 8 mu m was optimal); water and catalyst content; initiator vitality and content; as well as the thermal processing protocol. Once an optimal process was chosen, the scaffolds were tested in simulated body fluid (SBF) solution. Amorphous calcium phosphate formed in 8 h and crystallized hydroxycarbonate apatite (HCA) formed in 3 days. The compressive strength was approximately 2 MPa for a mean interconnect size of 140 mu m between the pores with a mean diameter of 379 mu m, which is thought to be a suitable porous network for vascularized bone regeneration. This material has the potential to bond to bone more rapidly and stimulate more bone growth than current porous artificial bone grafts. (C) 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据