4.8 Article

Regulation of electrospun scaffold stiffness via coaxial core diameter

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 1133-1139

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.10.025

关键词

Scaffold; Coaxial electrospinning; Mechanical properties; PCL; Gelatin

资金

  1. Institute for Materials Research (IMR) at the Ohio State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scaffold mechanics influence cellular behavior, including migration, phenotype and viability. Scaffold stiffness is commonly modulated through cross-linking, polymer density, or bioactive coatings on stiff substrates. These approaches provide useful information about cellular response to substrate stiffness: however, they are not ideal as the processing can change substrate morphology, density or chemistry. Coaxial electrospinning was investigated as a fabrication method to produce scaffolds with tunable stiffness and strength without changing architecture or surface chemistry. Core solution concentration, solvent and feed rate were utilized to control core diameter with higher solution concentration and feed rate positively correlating with increased fiber diameter and stiffness. Coaxial scaffolds electrospun with an 8 wt./vol.% polycaprolactone (PCL)-HFP solution at 1 ml h(-1) formed scaffolds with an average core diameter of 1.1 +/- 0.2 mu m and stiffness of 0.027 +/- 3.3 x 10(-3) N mm(-1). In contrast, fibers which were 2.6 +/- 0.1 mu m in core diameter yielded scaffolds with a stiffness of 0.065 +/- 4.7 x 10(-3) N mm(-1). Strength and stiffness positively correlated with core diameter with no significant difference in total fiber diameter and interfiber distance observed in as-spun scaffolds. These data indicate that coaxial core diameter can be utilized to tailor mechanical properties of three-dimensional scaffolds and would provide an ideal scaffold for assessing the effect of scaffold mechanics on cell behavior. (C) 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据