4.8 Article

Evaluation of 3-D bioactive glass scaffolds dissolution in a perfusion flow system with X-ray microtomography

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 2637-2643

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.009

关键词

Scaffold; Image analysis; Porosity; Bioactive glass; Dissolution

资金

  1. Philip Leverhulme Prize
  2. EPSRC [EP/F001452]
  3. Stryker Orthopaedics
  4. EPSRC [EP/I020861/1, EP/F001452/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I020861/1, EP/F001452/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioactive glass has high potential for bone regeneration due to its ability to bond to bone and stimulate osteogenesis whilst dissolving in the body. Although three-dimensional (3-D) bioactive glass scaffolds with favorable pore networks can be made from the sol-gel process, compositional and structural evolutions in their porous structures during degradation in vivo, or in vitro, have not been quantified. In this study, bioactive glass scaffolds were put in a simulated body fluid flow environment through a perfusion bioreactor. X-ray microtomography (mu CT) was used to non-destructively image the scaffolds at different degradation stages. A new 3-D image processing methodology was developed to quantify the scaffold's pore size, interconnect size and connectivity from mu CT images. The accurate measurement of individual interconnect size was made possible by a principal component analysis-based algorithm. During 28 days of dissolution, the modal interconnect size in the scaffold was reduced from 254 to 206 mu m due to the deposition of mineral phases. However, the pore size remained unchanged, with a mode of 682 mu M. The data presented are important for making bioactive glass scaffolds into clinical products. The technique described for imaging and quantifying scaffold pore structures as a function of degradation time is applicable to most scaffold systems. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据