4.8 Article

Synthesis, characterization and biocompatibility of poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline)-poly(D,L-lactide)-poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) hydrogels

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 4149-4159

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.011

关键词

Thermosensitive hydrogel; Human skin fibroblast cells; Biocompatibility; Poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline)-poly(D,L-lactide)-poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline); Scaffold

资金

  1. National Development of Significant New Drugs (New Preparation and New Technology) [2009zx09310]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2009CB930300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel thermoreversible hydrogel based on poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline)-derived amphiphilic triblock copolymer, poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline)-poly(D,L-lactide)-poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (PEOz-PLA-PEOz), was developed. The synthesis of PEOz-PLA-PEOz was carried out by coupling monohydroxylated PEOz-PLA diblocks with adipoyl chloride as coupling agent and dimethylamino pyridine as catalyst. The tube inverting and rheological tests showed that triblock copolymers had sol-gel-sol transition behavior with increasing temperature, and the gelation was found to be thermoreversible. The critical gelation concentration, the sol-gel transition temperature at a given concentration depended on the EOz/LA ratio and the molecular weight of PEOz. Scanning electron microscopy observation revealed that the resultant bulky gel exhibited an interconnected porous three-dimensional (3D) microstructure after freeze-drying. In addition, the hydrogels showed good cytocompatibility in vitro. MIT assays revealed that the human skin fibroblast cells encapsulated within the hydrogels were viable and proliferated inside the 3D scaffold. This newly described thermoreversible hydrogel demonstrated attractive properties to serve as cell matrix for a variety of tissue engineering applications or pharmaceutical delivery vehicles. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据