4.8 Article

Variations in rigidity and ligand density influence neuronal response in methylcellulose-laminin hydrogels

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 4102-4108

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.026

关键词

Hydrogel; 3-D neuronal culture; Laminin; Methylcellulose

资金

  1. NIH NRSA [F31 NS054527]
  2. NSF [EEC-9731643]
  3. NIH [EB001014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cells are continuously sensing their physical and chemical environment, generating dynamic interactions with the surrounding microenvironment and neighboring cells. Specific to neurons, neurite outgrowth is influenced by many factors, including the mechanical properties and adhesive signals of the growth substrata. In designing biomaterials for neural regeneration, it is important to understand the influence of substrate material, rigidity and bioadhesion on neurite outgrowth. To this end, we developed and characterized a tunable 3-D methylcellulose (MC) hydrogel polymeric system tethered to laminin-1 (MC-x-LN) across a range of substrate rigidities (G* range = 50-565 Pa) and laminin densities. Viability and neurite outgrowth of primary cortical neurons plated within 3-D MC hydrogels were used as cell outcome measures. After 4 days in culture, neuronal viability was significantly augmented with increasing rigidity for MC-x-LN as compared to control non-bioactive MC; however, neurite outgrowth was only observed in MC hydrogels with complex moduli of 565 Pa. Varying LN while maintaining a constant MC formulation (G* = 565 Pa) revealed a threshold response for neuronal viability, whereas a direct dose-dependent response to LN density was observed for neurite outgrowth. Collectively, these data demonstrate the synergistic play between material compliance and bioactive ligand concentrations within MC hydrogels. Such results can be used to better understand the adhesive and mechanical factors that mediate neuronal response to MC-based, tissue-engineered materials. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据