4.8 Article

Fluoride-containing bioactive glasses: Effect of glass design and structure on degradation, pH and apatite formation in simulated body fluid

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 3275-3282

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.043

关键词

Bioactive glass; Solid-state NMR; Bioactivity; Fluorapatite; Fluorine

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G00465X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. EPSRC [EP/G00465X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioactive glasses are able to bond to bone through formation of carbonated hydroxyapatite in body fluids, and fluoride-releasing bioactive glasses are of interest for both orthopaedic and, in particular, dental applications for canes inhibition. Melt-derived glasses in the system SiO2-P2O5-CaO-Na2O with increasing amounts of CaF2 were prepared by keeping network connectivity and the ratio of all other components constant. pH change, ion release and apatite formation during immersion of glass powder in simulated body fluid at 37 degrees C over up to 2 weeks were investigated Crystal phases formed in SBF were characterized using infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction with Rietveld analysis and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (F-19 and P-31 MAS-NMR) Results show that incorporation of fluoride resulted in a reduced pH rise in aqueous solutions compared to fluoride-free glasses and in formation of fluorapatite (FAp), which is more chemically stable than hydroxyapatite or carbonated hydroxyapatite and therefore is of interest for dental applications. However, for increasing fluoride content in the glass, fluorite (CaF2) was formed at the expense of FAp. Apatite formation could be favoured by increasing the phosphate content in the glass, as the release of additional phosphate Into the SBF would affect supersaturation in the solution and possibly favour formation of apatite (C) 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据