4.8 Article

Effects of Staphylococcus epidermidis on osteoblast cell adhesion and viability on a Ti alloy surface in a microfluidic co-culture environment

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 6, 期 11, 页码 4422-4429

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.05.021

关键词

Orthopedic implant infection; Osteoblast; Staphylococcus epidermidis; Microfluidics; Titanium alloy

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [NIRT-CBET 0708379]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A microfluidic device was used for real time imaging of MC3T3-E1 murine calvarial pre-osteoblasts (osteoblasts) in response to very small numbers of Staphylococcus epidermidis inoculated on the surface of a polished TiAl6V4 alloy in a serum-based medium. The Ti alloy surface was integrated to a poly(dimethylsiloxane) fluidic housing with eight 10 mu l channels for high-throughput, cross-contamination-free co-culture. In the absence of S. epidermidis osteoblasts were able to adhere, spread, proliferate and remain viable on the Ti alloy surface during a 25 h culture period. With 10(2) or 10(5) colony forming units (cfu) ml(-1) S. epidermidis inoculated on the alloy surface osteoblast adhesion, spreading and proliferation were not adversely affected during the early stages of culture. However, osteoblasts became damaged by the end of culture, as S. epidermidis actively proliferated in the co-culture channels and formed small clusters on the alloy surface. These observations suggest that the small numbers of S. epidermidis did not necessarily compete with osteoblasts for the alloy surface during initial host cell development, but rapid proliferation of the bacteria might have changed the microenvironment, making it unfavorable to sustain the viability of osteoblasts. The results provide a new insight in projecting the potential utility of the microfluidic co-culture approach to developing physiologically and clinically relevant in vitro models of orthopedic implant-associated bacterial infection. (C) 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据