4.8 Article

Foamed surfactant solution as a template for self-setting injectable hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone regeneration

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 876-885

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.018

关键词

Calcium phosphate cement; Hydroxyapatite foam; Scaffold; Surfactant; Injectable material

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science [MAT2006-11516]
  2. Mexican Council for Science and Technology (CONACyT)
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the field of orthopaedic surgery has created a growing need for new injectable synthetic materials that can be used for bone grafting In this work a novel fully synthetic injectable calcium phosphate foam was developed by mixing alpha-tricalcium phosphate (alpha-TCP) powder with a foamed polysorbate 80 solution Polysorbate 80 is a non-ionic surfactant approved for parenteral applications The foam was able to retain the porous structure after injection provided that the foamed paste was injected shortly after mixing (typically 2 5 min), and set through the hydrolysis of alpha-TCP to a calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite, thus producing a hydroxyapatite solid foam in situ The effect of different processing parameters on the porosity. microstructure, injectability and mechanical properties of the hydroxyapatite foams was analysed, and the ability of the pre-set foam to support osteoblastic-like cell proliferation and differentiation was assessed. Interestingly, the concentration of surfactant needed to obtain the foams was lower than that considered safe in drug formulations for parenteral administration The possibility of combining bioactivity, injectability, macroporosity and self-setting ability in a single fully synthetic material represents a step forward in the design of new materials for bone regeneration compatible with minimally invasive surgical techniques. (C) 2009 Acta Materialia Inc Published by Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据