4.8 Article

Genetic profiling of osteoblast-like cells cultured on a novel bone reconstructive material, consisting of poly-L-lactide, carbon nanotubes and microhydroxyapatite, in the presence of bone morphogenetic protein-2

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 6, 期 11, 页码 4352-4360

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.013

关键词

In vitro; Genetic profiling; Carbon nanotubes; Hydroxyapatite; Bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In bone tissue engineering composite materials have been introduced, combining a degradable polymer matrix with, for instance, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to improve mechanical properties or with microhydroxyapatite (mu HA) to improve osteoconduction. The addition of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) can further improve the biological response to the material. However, the influence of such an elaborate composite formation on osteoprogenitor cells is unknown. To examine this, rat bone marrow (RBM) cells were cultured on porous poly-I-lactic acid and composite scaffolds, with or without added BMP-2. Cell proliferation and differentiation were studied using DNA, alkaline phosphatase and scanning electron microscopic analysis. Further, genetic profiles were examined by microarray investigation. Results showed that the composite scaffold had no significant effect on the proliferation of RBM cells, but indicated a negative effect on cell differentiation. The addition of BMP-2 also had no significant effect on the proliferation of RBM cells, but differentiation towards the osteogenic lineage was confirmed. In the arrays results, the addition of BMP-2 alone led to the expression of genes involved in (minor) inflammation. The composite scaffold, and even more distinctly the combination of the composite scaffold with BMP-2, led to the expression of genes, based on gene ontology, connected to tumorigenesis. Therefore, CNT- and mu HA-containing composite materials are not recommended as a bone restorative material. (C) 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据